Hillary Clinton is hedging her bets regarding UFO disclosure, saying that if there are national security issues involved, she won’t be able to proceed after she enters office.

We know for certain that Jimmy Carter promised to tell all prior to entering office, then refused to do so. More recently, he has refused even answer questions about the matter.

Laurence Rockefeller was a passing acquaintance of mine, and we once had a discussion about what happened when he attempted to confront Bill Clinton with the question. Clinton replied, simply, that he couldn’t discuss it.

We also know that there are documents that are more than thirty years old that are not defined as national security matters, otherwise John Podesta, in his February tweet on the subject, would not have added that revealing them is “the law.” Unless there is a continuing national security need, information must be released from classification after a 30 year period.

However, if the release of a piece of information might lead indirectly to compromise of a national security matter, then that information can continue to be withheld.

Astronaut Gordon Cooper observed a UFO on the ground at Edwards Air Force Base in 1957. He said publicly, and told me personally, that films had been taken of it and sent on to Washington. They were obviously classified because they have never been released. They were of a silver object standing at the end of a runway, according to Cooper. It displayed no weapons and appeared to pose no threat. So the photographs do not show something that displays a threat. They would be an example, perhaps, of what John Podesta was referring to when he said that there are documents that should be released because they are no longer legally classified. (Note: there has been some online controversy about whether or not Cooper saw the object itself. His public statements are ambiguous. He told me that he saw it personally.)

I have been told by somebody I believe to be reliable that Jimmy Carter received a briefing about this subject that moved him deeply and upset him profoundly, and led to his subsequent refusal to discuss it further.

It seems clear enough that there is an overarching national security issue that prevents the release of any and all documentary evidence that UFOs are intelligently controlled. Or is it a national security issue? It could also be a social issue.

Say the Gordon Cooper photographs were released, or documents confirming that objects had been detected in the past that were indisputably under intelligent control, what would happen?

I doubt that more than a week would pass before the media would be asking about the alien abductions. Moreover, in the interest of ratings, they would be telling the most sensational and terrifying stories they could, without the slightest sense of responsibility and little regard for the truth. The very worst practitioners of the cult of the evil alien would become immediate sensations.

People like me, with my complex vision of this enigma, would be ignored. The public wants a story about good guys and bad guys, not a nuanced and subtle approach that leads with questions. And yet, in the absence of such an approach, any disclosure process is in danger of becoming a great waste.

I think, and have thought for a long time, that the visitors themselves, in all their complexity and contradiction, are probably in control of the disclosure process. I doubt that it’s ever going to be up to a president, or anybody in our official world, to make any final decisions about it. What’s worse, those keeping the secrets may not be entirely candid about their reasons for doing so, or their need for secrecy.

If you were a newly elected president and suddenly found yourself in a briefing being directed in a way that you had never imagined possible and by individuals you had never dreamed existed, you would be shocked into a loss of discrimination. Anything that was said to you under such circumstances, you would take as gospel.

However, from my long experience with the visitors, I would say that such a reaction is literally the worst possible response. Even under such circumstances, which I know from my own life are fantastically difficult to handle, a degree of skepticism must be preserved.

For example, despite the public folklore and the secret community’s assumptions, we don’t even know if we’re dealing with aliens. We don’t know what we’re dealing with. None of us do, not even those who have been told by the visitors themselves what the truth is. It may or may not be the truth. In fact, it’s perfectly possible that the visitors—by which I mean the whole array of apparitions assumed to be aliens—might not know what they are any more than we know what we are.

So the person entering the White House is going to be confronted by an astonishing emotional and intellectual challenge that it would take years of preparation to have the slightest hope of responding in a useful manner.

Over the past few years, I have been laying what I hope is some good intellectual groundwork in publishing Solving the Communion Enigma and Super Natural. Should there be disclosure, the books point a way to rational discussion of the issues it presents.

Maybe that will make a difference. I like to think it might. Perhaps if the groundwork I and others have been doing matters at all, the visitors will allow the edge of the curtain to be raised after all. We certainly need it. We are on the accelerating curve of an extinction event on Planet Earth, and a new perspective is crucial to our survival.

An admission that the visitors were an unknown and intelligent presence would bring our best minds to the problem. I cannot even imagine what they would discover, but I do know this: a door will be opened, and a new world will beckon to us from the beyond.

 

22 Comments

  1. I’m trying to get my mind
    I’m trying to get my mind around what it would be like for a new president with a desire to be the one who told the world that UFO’s and aliens are visiting us, only to find out that the truth of the matter is what is communicated in your book Super Natural. That would be a horrifyingly stressful place to be in. Aside from what the public might think, how would the president be able to process that on an individual level? All the while trying to tread the path of leading an enormously complex and disastrously garbled mess of a country. If silence isn’t chosen, a rather lengthy visit to a psych hospital might be the only other option. All under the most public eye on earth. Sheesh!

    I have had many years to process this information. All of your books, Whitley, have been the sign posts you hope them to be. There are others who write well about it too. That any of this information existed at all may not have ever even occurred to a president or any other commonly public figure.

    It takes so many internal realizations along the way. From the first experience that makes you say to yourself “what the hell was that?!” all the way to the ingenious phrase above “In fact, it’s perfectly possible that the visitors—by which I mean the whole array of apparitions assumed to be aliens—might not know what they are any more than we know what we are.” which leads to the only solution to the situation. “To be as a clear glass through which God can Shine.” It cannot be processed with much value except over many years of difficulty.

    It really is such an impossible situation. I think you, Whitley, intentionally or no, have communicated with your life what it means to square the circle. Sorry to be vague or meandering. I’m really trying to understand this.

    Doubt.
    Doubt Thyself.
    Doubt even if Thou doubtest Thyself.

    Doubt.
    Doubt All.
    Doubt even if Thou doubtest All.

    …and now on with the chase!

    paraphrased from Aleister Crowley’s “The Book of Lies”

  2. I’m trying to get my mind
    I’m trying to get my mind around what it would be like for a new president with a desire to be the one who told the world that UFO’s and aliens are visiting us, only to find out that the truth of the matter is what is communicated in your book Super Natural. That would be a horrifyingly stressful place to be in. Aside from what the public might think, how would the president be able to process that on an individual level? All the while trying to tread the path of leading an enormously complex and disastrously garbled mess of a country. If silence isn’t chosen, a rather lengthy visit to a psych hospital might be the only other option. All under the most public eye on earth. Sheesh!

    I have had many years to process this information. All of your books, Whitley, have been the sign posts you hope them to be. There are others who write well about it too. That any of this information existed at all may not have ever even occurred to a president or any other commonly public figure.

    It takes so many internal realizations along the way. From the first experience that makes you say to yourself “what the hell was that?!” all the way to the ingenious phrase above “In fact, it’s perfectly possible that the visitors—by which I mean the whole array of apparitions assumed to be aliens—might not know what they are any more than we know what we are.” which leads to the only solution to the situation. “To be as a clear glass through which God can Shine.” It cannot be processed with much value except over many years of difficulty.

    It really is such an impossible situation. I think you, Whitley, intentionally or no, have communicated with your life what it means to square the circle. Sorry to be vague or meandering. I’m really trying to understand this.

    Doubt.
    Doubt Thyself.
    Doubt even if Thou doubtest Thyself.

    Doubt.
    Doubt All.
    Doubt even if Thou doubtest All.

    …and now on with the chase!

    paraphrased from Aleister Crowley’s “The Book of Lies”

  3. A very good article. You new
    A very good article. You new book is the best on the issue I have ever read. I believe that there will be lots of sensational claims by many when and if disclosure happens. However, when “Orthon” cannot materialize at the time predicted by those with sensational claims, people like yourself will be the ones that the media will turn to as a source of knowledge. Those of us who have had a lifetime of experiences will start to come forward and our common patterns will help reveal that this phenomenon is never easy to understand. After disclosure, there will not likely be a landing on the White House lawn. There will still be mystery. My hope is that the universal messages given to experiencers of planetary concern will take on a new urgency. I firmly believe disclosure is more about us and our path forward than about them. Thanks

  4. A very good article. You new
    A very good article. You new book is the best on the issue I have ever read. I believe that there will be lots of sensational claims by many when and if disclosure happens. However, when “Orthon” cannot materialize at the time predicted by those with sensational claims, people like yourself will be the ones that the media will turn to as a source of knowledge. Those of us who have had a lifetime of experiences will start to come forward and our common patterns will help reveal that this phenomenon is never easy to understand. After disclosure, there will not likely be a landing on the White House lawn. There will still be mystery. My hope is that the universal messages given to experiencers of planetary concern will take on a new urgency. I firmly believe disclosure is more about us and our path forward than about them. Thanks

  5. What a disingenuous cop-out
    What a disingenuous cop-out by Hillary – of course UFOs have national security implications! ‘UFOs and Nukes’ by Hastings or any of Richard Dolan’s books will convince anyone interested in the topic of that. I agree with Whitley above that the visitors, whatever they are, are in control of their own disclosure.

  6. What a disingenuous cop-out
    What a disingenuous cop-out by Hillary – of course UFOs have national security implications! ‘UFOs and Nukes’ by Hastings or any of Richard Dolan’s books will convince anyone interested in the topic of that. I agree with Whitley above that the visitors, whatever they are, are in control of their own disclosure.

  7. Aliens and UFO’s for better
    Aliens and UFO’s for better or worse are in our pop culture more now than ever except maybe during the 50’s. One thing that most Americans like is pop culture. If Hillary can use pop culture to get more votes she would be doing a disservice to her campaign by not using the UFO angle that her husband was known to have an interest in. I don’t think she really cares one way or the other about the whole visitor thing, she just wants those pop culture votes. Easy to just say she cant talk about it after she becomes potus just like Carter and everyone else.

  8. Aliens and UFO’s for better
    Aliens and UFO’s for better or worse are in our pop culture more now than ever except maybe during the 50’s. One thing that most Americans like is pop culture. If Hillary can use pop culture to get more votes she would be doing a disservice to her campaign by not using the UFO angle that her husband was known to have an interest in. I don’t think she really cares one way or the other about the whole visitor thing, she just wants those pop culture votes. Easy to just say she cant talk about it after she becomes potus just like Carter and everyone else.

  9. The question of whether or
    The question of whether or not a given document must be withheld is a legal one. I suspect that John Podesta already knows that there are documents being withheld that do not have national security implications and would not affect information that does by their release. Otherwise, he wouldn’t have said that the release of such documents is “the law.” Of course, if the US government doesn’t have the final say, then I can only hope that Super Natural and Solving the Communion Enigma have done their intended job and provided a basis for useful inquiry, and that the response will be to allow the documents Podesta referenced to be released.

  10. The question of whether or
    The question of whether or not a given document must be withheld is a legal one. I suspect that John Podesta already knows that there are documents being withheld that do not have national security implications and would not affect information that does by their release. Otherwise, he wouldn’t have said that the release of such documents is “the law.” Of course, if the US government doesn’t have the final say, then I can only hope that Super Natural and Solving the Communion Enigma have done their intended job and provided a basis for useful inquiry, and that the response will be to allow the documents Podesta referenced to be released.

  11. I think that the its totally
    I think that the its totally improbable that discloser is going to happen. It would be like a modern day government saying sorry for war crimes…. Its just not going to happen.

    Politicians say “i’ll look into it” for votes. Thats it. But however Mr. Strieber is right in saying “I think, and have thought for a long time, that the visitors themselves, in all their complexity and contradiction, are probably in control of the disclosure process.”

    I find the greatest push for discloser comes from sections of the UFO community that have no contact with the visitors at all.This section I’ve found over the years have done a lot of harm to abductees…or experiencers. {I’m a little old school on that one}. I think it was in communion that Whitley wrote… perhaps the fairies have had their own technological revolution. {something along those lines} MAYBE THEY HAVE…. this would hurt a lot of people in the UFO community. But I can tell you from my own experience… the visitors act in a way not unlike the Fairies…weird and strange and stupid. Certainly not like a human idea of what an E.T would be like.

  12. I think that the its totally
    I think that the its totally improbable that discloser is going to happen. It would be like a modern day government saying sorry for war crimes…. Its just not going to happen.

    Politicians say “i’ll look into it” for votes. Thats it. But however Mr. Strieber is right in saying “I think, and have thought for a long time, that the visitors themselves, in all their complexity and contradiction, are probably in control of the disclosure process.”

    I find the greatest push for discloser comes from sections of the UFO community that have no contact with the visitors at all.This section I’ve found over the years have done a lot of harm to abductees…or experiencers. {I’m a little old school on that one}. I think it was in communion that Whitley wrote… perhaps the fairies have had their own technological revolution. {something along those lines} MAYBE THEY HAVE…. this would hurt a lot of people in the UFO community. But I can tell you from my own experience… the visitors act in a way not unlike the Fairies…weird and strange and stupid. Certainly not like a human idea of what an E.T would be like.

  13. What harm is being done by
    What harm is being done by withholding the information, regardless of the reason?

    Hilary just needed a reason she could easily understand and supplicate to, National Security! Incredibly shallow. Do people even have a brain anymore, in order to realize the ramifications of this type of information? Should one consign it to a simple explanation like that? Clearly, Hilary does not have the will to handle this situation. “For reasons of National Security” could mean one thing: the power structures want to maintain their exorbitant power. This is not a reasonable reason, it is a selfish one. It is not a democratic one. It is not for the people, it is for the Elites. I demand that Hilary demands a more in depth explanation than National Security, because frankly that is not good enough, given the subject. Politically, people need to really question cloaked explanations.

    Finally, I am beginning to detest the Visitors themselves, for their ongoing involvement in this charade.

    Laugh curtains, acts of derision (aimed at those who have UFO experiences), intentional evasion, cover ups and cloaked explanations are an affront to humanity. These are all part of human and alien subterfuge.

    When people are threatened, they often act irrationally. They may give their support easily to a “protector”. They don’t stop to think that their support of a protector entity may not be for their own good, but mostly for the good of the protector and its power base. This protector has its own selfish reasons for accepting support and keeping secrets, and these may even oppose the livelihood or spirit of the interests of the ones giving their support. This is why people fall for wars that don’t make sense. It is blind patriotism that does not see the implications of acts, only sees “Us Vs. Them”. “National Security”, as a reason for not releasing UFO information, may not be for your own good. Think about it. It may be that Aliens are a dangerous force that is bent on destroying humanity somehow. That’s an Us Vs. Them scenario. Or, it may be something else entirely. Don’t take people’s word in ignorance.

  14. What harm is being done by
    What harm is being done by withholding the information, regardless of the reason?

    Hilary just needed a reason she could easily understand and supplicate to, National Security! Incredibly shallow. Do people even have a brain anymore, in order to realize the ramifications of this type of information? Should one consign it to a simple explanation like that? Clearly, Hilary does not have the will to handle this situation. “For reasons of National Security” could mean one thing: the power structures want to maintain their exorbitant power. This is not a reasonable reason, it is a selfish one. It is not a democratic one. It is not for the people, it is for the Elites. I demand that Hilary demands a more in depth explanation than National Security, because frankly that is not good enough, given the subject. Politically, people need to really question cloaked explanations.

    Finally, I am beginning to detest the Visitors themselves, for their ongoing involvement in this charade.

    Laugh curtains, acts of derision (aimed at those who have UFO experiences), intentional evasion, cover ups and cloaked explanations are an affront to humanity. These are all part of human and alien subterfuge.

    When people are threatened, they often act irrationally. They may give their support easily to a “protector”. They don’t stop to think that their support of a protector entity may not be for their own good, but mostly for the good of the protector and its power base. This protector has its own selfish reasons for accepting support and keeping secrets, and these may even oppose the livelihood or spirit of the interests of the ones giving their support. This is why people fall for wars that don’t make sense. It is blind patriotism that does not see the implications of acts, only sees “Us Vs. Them”. “National Security”, as a reason for not releasing UFO information, may not be for your own good. Think about it. It may be that Aliens are a dangerous force that is bent on destroying humanity somehow. That’s an Us Vs. Them scenario. Or, it may be something else entirely. Don’t take people’s word in ignorance.

  15. Should she becomes President,
    Should she becomes President, Hilary should approach this question of alien presence here on Earth with the notion that it is possible the people who are withholding the information are guilty of treason against the human race. As Commander in Chief, she is obligated and has the right to know all information that is being withheld. Where she takes it from there is up to her; she could explore her own ideas on the subject. She should take back the reigns from those who have secluded this alien information and technology for so long. She deserves full control.

  16. Should she becomes President,
    Should she becomes President, Hilary should approach this question of alien presence here on Earth with the notion that it is possible the people who are withholding the information are guilty of treason against the human race. As Commander in Chief, she is obligated and has the right to know all information that is being withheld. Where she takes it from there is up to her; she could explore her own ideas on the subject. She should take back the reigns from those who have secluded this alien information and technology for so long. She deserves full control.

  17. The other reason i thought of
    The other reason i thought of for non disclosure is the damage done to the environment. We can argue over 1947 and new technologies from E.T. But we were pumping fossil fuels into the atmosphere 50 years before that. Without E.T tech coming into play. The well to do would eventually come across this technology and have wound it up in such a way that it would seem like magic to the common man. The E.T side of things pushed technology enough to spill over into the community. Why ? because of the impending doom caused by pollution. Look at the internet and how that reaches everyone.

  18. The other reason i thought of
    The other reason i thought of for non disclosure is the damage done to the environment. We can argue over 1947 and new technologies from E.T. But we were pumping fossil fuels into the atmosphere 50 years before that. Without E.T tech coming into play. The well to do would eventually come across this technology and have wound it up in such a way that it would seem like magic to the common man. The E.T side of things pushed technology enough to spill over into the community. Why ? because of the impending doom caused by pollution. Look at the internet and how that reaches everyone.

  19. Honestly, the last thing I
    Honestly, the last thing I need is an update from the White House (or the Kremlin, etc., for that matter) on what’s happening with regard to ET intelligence, let alone T.

    Imagine what would happen if legions of lights suddenly began to hover in plain view, across the face of the Earth. I’m staying as far away from the FEMA line as I possibly can.

    I say keep it closed.

  20. Honestly, the last thing I
    Honestly, the last thing I need is an update from the White House (or the Kremlin, etc., for that matter) on what’s happening with regard to ET intelligence, let alone T.

    Imagine what would happen if legions of lights suddenly began to hover in plain view, across the face of the Earth. I’m staying as far away from the FEMA line as I possibly can.

    I say keep it closed.

  21. HAPPY BIRTHDAY !!!
    HAPPY BIRTHDAY !!!

  22. HAPPY BIRTHDAY !!!
    HAPPY BIRTHDAY !!!

Comments are closed.