News Stories

Men, We'll Miss 'Em

You may not have noticed, but women are now on top. They're supporting their families during the recession, because they're more flexible--they're better at adapting to major changes in the economy and the culture. Is the recession really a "mancession?"

In the recession, three-quarters of the millions of jobs lost were lost by men. The worst-hit industries were overwhelmingly male, such as construction, manufacturing, and high finance. In 2009, for the first time in American history, the workforce tipped towards women, who continue to occupy around half of our nation's jobs.

This is a worldwide phenomenon: Women in poor parts of India are learning English faster than men, to meet the demands of new global call centers. Women own more than 40% of private businesses in China. Icelanders made Johanna Sigurdardottir prime minister, electing the world's first openly lesbian head of state.

But the recession merely revealed--and accelerated--a profound economic shift that has been going on for at least 30 years and in some respects even longer: For the first time in 200,000 years of human history, women have in many ways surpassed men, and there may now be no going back.

In the September 29the edition of the UK Observer, Hanna Rosin writes: "In the past, men derived their advantage largely from size and strength, but the post-industrial economy is indifferent to brawn. A service and information economy rewards precisely the opposite qualities--the ones that can't be easily replaced by a machine. These attributes--social intelligence, open communication, the ability to sit still and focus--are, at a minimum, not predominantly the province of men. In fact, they seem to come easily to women."

Rosin asks: "(If) men (have) already been laid low by the recession of the 1990s, where are they now, nearly 20 years later, after this last series of blows? And how will they find their way back?"

Hey, on Dreamland, we do our part: We have wonderful female hosts like Anne Strieber and Marie D. Jones and we INTERVIEW fascinating women as well! (NOTE: Subscribers can still listen to these female-driven shows).

Women are just plain superior to men--no doubt about it. That's why we have so many male-centered religions that push women to the sidelines--they're SCARED of us!

I'm not a big fan of any viewpoint that encourages division. Division and scrambling for advantage just ENCOURAGE fear, and fear begets hostility and violence. I think the necessary mindset was well stated by a friar who said Mass here in Chicago just after the 9/11 attacks. People were highly emotional, sad and angry, looking for direction. But what this priest said in his sermon was, "The world is now too small for there to be a Them and an Us. Now there's only Us." Meaning, all of us, together.

Men and women are flip sides of the same coin. Where men are strong, women are not very, and vice versa. History shows that when times are primitive and dangerous, men are at an advantage, and in decadent, easy times obviously women will be at the advantage. It's just too bad when things finally get better for women (and minorities) the world is about to experience some major changes because we're in some kind of endtimes. But the genders adjust to the times they live in, and what it takes to survive.

Elaine/AnimalSpiritS/Diana Roth, if women were so superior, then how come Men have the highest recorded I.Q.s. Even though I have never been much of a chauvinist, explain how you are superior than the man next to you, Elaine? It seems you have issues with men in general for you to make such an egotistical comment. The only thing you seem to be superior at is being an utter annoyance.

No women are running for President? Not true. Jill Stein of the Green Party is running for President.

Subscribe to Unknowncountry sign up now