Note: This journal entry was posted on September 15 and
accidentally deleted. It is now being re-posted.
Yes, indeed, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have just been
bailed out to the tune of hundreds of billion dollars of
debt that has been transferred right onto the backs of us,
the American people. And now Lehman Brothers, after
making--and pocketing--billions of dollars in profits by
securitizing mortgages and other consumer loans, is about to
be rescued to the tune of at least another thirty billion
dollars of your debt.
You think you owe Visa! You owe Wall Street a whole lot
more, because these federal guarantees are based on your
future ability to pay your taxes. And, believe me, if you
should become unable to pay, you won't get any bailout.
They'll come in and throw you right out of your house in the
clothes on your back, and your family along with you.
When an American gets in financial trouble and can no longer
pay his loans, he doesn't get a bailout. Far from it, he
gets an immediate, and gigantic, bill from the IRS. Here's
how it happens. Say you have excellent credit and a prime 30
year mortgage. You haven't played any games, you've paid a
good down payment and you are on time with every payment.
Then you lose your job because your company is outsourcing
to India. So you can no longer afford your home and you
decide to sell and move into a smaller place.
Problem is, the house you bought in 2002 for $300,000 is now
worth only $180,000--theoretically. And, if you have tried
to sell a house recently, you know just what I mean by
'theoretically.' Your real estate agent will tell you that
it could be six months to a year before you find a buyer. Or
longer. Or never.
So now you can't move because you can't sell your house, and
you can't wait much longer or you'll be destitute.
You've discovered that there
are no jobs in your town at anything like what you were
getting. Guys in Mumbai are doing the same work for a third
what you were paid. And this is not blue collar work. You
were a white collar employee with a hundred thousand dollars
invested in your education. You were a pillar of the
community, your kids are making good grades in school, and
you are, in every way, the finest America has to offer.
In desperation, you try a workout with the bank. And the
bank is accommodating. They agree to let you sell them the
house short. Being an honest, hardworking American, you
scrape together every dollar you can and you get your bank
$20,000. In return, they cancel your mortgage and you leave
for a small rental unit, your family in tow.
When tax time rolls around you open your mail to find a 1099
from the bank. It shows you receiving income of $280,000,
the difference between what you paid on your mortgage and
what you owed. Now, notice, the bank was able to ignore the
fact that your house wasn't worth any $300,000. It assumed
none of the risk. You had to take it all. And that's the
law, written that way because congress belongs to banks and
big companies, not to us, not anymore.
You may know your congressman, perhaps your senator. But I
can assure you of this: Democrat or Republican, it doesn't
matter. He does not work for you. He works for whatever
corporate lobby buys him.
By this time, you are working at a fast food restaurant for
a third of what you made before, and even that job is in
jeopardy because your friends, whose jobs have all gone to
India and China, too, can't exactly afford hamburgers anymore.
But you have a huge problem. You owe the IRS on that
$280,000, and you owe it in IRS time, which is NOW NOW NOW.
Frantic, you call them for a workout. No dice. You can't
arrange payments for anything over $25,000, but you owe
$80,000.
So what happens? I'll tell you what happens: the IRS takes
every penny of cash you possess, and all of your salary
except what you need for food, shelter and clothing--and
they decide what that is--and possibly anything that
is easily salable. You are left with little or nothing, and
you STILL owe them every single penny you have not yet paid.
You have to leave your little apartment for public housing.
You have to resort to food stamps, if there are any. And if
you should get sick, you will have to throw yourself on the
charity of the doctors and the hospitals.
What does that mean? This is what it means: when my wife was
in the hospital and needed a platinum coil in her brain to
repair her aneurysm, the doctor sent word: who's going to
pay for this coil? If I had not been insured, or had not had
cash, the answer would have been, no coil.
This is real. It happens every day, as desperate Americans
struggle after being tricked into life-destroying workouts
with their banks.
So, what's the solution?
One thing would be to return the bankruptcy laws to what
they were before Tom DeLay rammed through a bill that had
been stalled in committee for six years that revised the law
and made it, essentially, impossible to go bankrupt. He did
this after receiving a $500,000 contribution from the
banking lobby.
Under the old laws, you could vacate your debts and start
over. The law was designed to encourage entrepreneurs to
take risks, people like Steve Jobs and and Steve Wozniak,
who started Apple in a garage. Would they have taken that
risk if they had known that failure would mean that the debt
would stay with them for the rest of their lives? The answer
could not be more clear: there would be no Apple today, and
all the wealth and innovation this company has brought to
the world would not exist.
When the new bankruptcy law was being passed, I was shocked
to see that conservatives were in favor of it. But I should
not have been, because conservatism has changed in our
country, and gone from being something that I loved to
something that I do not even recognize.
Back when I was a boy in the fifties, we had an organization
called the John Birch Society. Now, I was not a member, but
I knew a lot of members, and I was in favor of many of their
positions.
In those days, for example, the left was trying to impose
water fluoridation on American cities, and the John Birch
Society, and the conservative movement, were against it.
They opposed it because it forced something on the
individual, thus compelling him to bow to the collective and
abandon his own individual freedom.
Then, in the year 2002, I heard another, new story about
fluoridation from conservatives. Suddenly, the churches and
the Republican party were saying that this was something we
needed to do for our kids.
What?
I looked into this, and discovered that Mosanto, which makes
the fluoride used in municipal water systems, was
approaching Christian leaders and municipalities all over the
country and offering them various incentives to go along
with this.
In 1952, the conservative movement would have rejected these
overtures from a big company with contempt. And did, as a
matter of fact. But by 2002, the conservative movement had
ceased to be about preserving individual freedom and had
become about enhancing corporate profit, taken there by
cynical leaders who put their own wealth first and their
ideals far, far behind.
I am not against corporations. That's not what this is
about. I am against abuse of the individual and the
destruction of his freedom, and no matter what entities are
favored over him. When the individual is made second to big
institutions, be they corporate or governmental, then this
is no longer America.
We have seen over the past twenty years a total
abandonment of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, an incredibly
important piece of legislation conceived and shepherded into
law by a dedicated conservative Republican, Senator John
Sherman. It was signed into law by Benjamin Harrison in
1890, and was intended not to prevent monopolization by
companies who achieved their monopolies by the excellence of
their offerings, but to prevent the creation of artifical
monopolies that operate by combination, such as the recent
Sirius-XM satellite radio merger, or the monopolistic
practices of Microsoft, which gained a stifling monopoly
over operating system software using practices that would
appear to be
specifically prohibited by the act.
And recently, Alan Greenspan actually had the gall to
condemn the Sherman Anti-Trust Act as being
anti-corporation, and was applauded by Wall Street, many
congressmen, and, of course, the corporate world that would
like to see the act repealed. (But it doesn't need to be
repealed, actually. It has already been abandoned by the
courts.)
What we have seen over the past fifty years, is the invasion
and subversion of the conservative movement in America by a
cabal of political and corporate profiteers, and they have
run roughshod over the individual and his freedoms. We no
longer live in a democracy, but in a corporatocracy, and
what is worse, the average company doesn't look ahead to the
future, but only to the next quarterly report.
The result of this is that it means nothing to them to toss
Americans out of work and send their jobs abroad, or, as
also happens, to bring in guest workers from other countries
and literally put them in offices that have been vacated by
Americans.
A real conservative stands first for individual freedom,
second for the value of the enterpreneur, and third for the
economic welfare of the country.
Globalization is anathema to conservatism. Globalization is
about corporate socialism, and the transformation of the
first world into a new third world. What is happening is
that the average American is becoming a serf or a beggar,
while these strange new socialists, the corporate owners,
are becoming a new aristocracy--and, of course, there is a
historical precedent for this.
It comes from ancient Rome. Now, I know that America does
not respect history. But this is only because we do not KNOW
history. It has a lot to each us, so listen up. One of the
things that enabled the establishment of the Augustan
prinicpate was that large landowners were bought off by
exempting them from taxes. In modern terms, this is the 15%
corporate tax, and all the bailouts, first of banks and
financial institutions and soon, have no doubt, of other
industries as well. Meanwhile, is YOUR tax even close to
15%. I doubt it, not if you make a living income.
And if you do, you're lucky, because so much work has been
transferred abroad by companies in search of profits. It's
not entirely their fault. If they kept their American
employees, they would not be able to compete with, for
example, Chinese and Indian companies that employ de-facto
slave labor.
And I am not talking just about factory workers, here. I am
talking about the hundreds of thousands of white collar
employees who have lost their jobs.
When you pick up the phone to talk to your computer company,
you don't talk to an American. You talk, most likely to
someone in the Philippines or India or southeast Asia or some
such place. The American who had that job, and did it
carefully and intelligently rather than reading from some
instruction booklet, is now pushing pipe at the local Home
Depot, if he's lucky.
So, what do we need to do about all this. First of all, no
matter who wins the presidency in November, there will be no
change. That's why Barack Obama won't say exactly what he
intends to change: he intends to change nothing. And John
McCain and the much maligned Sarah Palin are not
conservatives at all. They are supporters of the corporate
socialist state, and they will set about just what the Roman
emperors set about fifteen hundred years ago, when Rome
began to fail.
They literally crushed the taxable class--read you and me,
folks--by saddling them with confiscatory taxation, to the
point that people who could not raise enough money were
often beaten to death.
Meanwhile, the landowners, the equivalent of the big
corporations of today, got richer and richer. So, of course,
when the barbarians showed up at the gates, people could not
have been more delighted.
But there was a profound disconnect, as a result. When the
Roman Empire died, so did commerce, literature, art,
civility and any vestige of prosperity.
It was nearly a thousand years before anything approaching a
decent civil life reappeared in Europe.
It's fair to ask, at this point, what we can do. For
starters, we need to take a new look at globalization and
the whole idea of an American empire. George Bush entered
office, in part, by promising fewer entanglements abroad. He
lied, of course, because the corporatocracy needs
entanglements abroad to feed its profit gods.
We need to abandon globalization and go back to a proper
tariff-protected enconomy that keeps the money and the jobs
right here at home. We also need to pull in our imperial
horns and just forget the rest of the world. Let it do
whatever it wants to do, but without us. We are not the
policemen of the world, and we don't have some sort of
manifest destiny to bring democracy to those who don't want
it and don't understand it.
Let's manufacture here, farm here, build here and live here.
We can certainly find adequate energy sources here. Oil
drilling techniques have changed radically in the forty
years we've been forbidding drilling in environmentally
sensitive areas. We can have our cake and eat it, too.
Similarly, atomic energy has changed. It's safer now and we
need to embrace it. If it wasn't safer, France would be
destroyed, but that is emphatically not the case. The French
are mostly nuclear powered, and they do just fine, thank
you. So can we.
And then there are alternative energy sources. Let's use
some of that great American initiative to develop them.
Return to our entrepreneurs the same incentives that their
pioneer forefathers had, which was to dare the whirlwind.
And if they miss the brass ring--then yes, let the big bank
share the risk with the government, and give the
entrepreneur another chance.
We need to change our priorities, and return the individual
to his traditional place in the conservative movement: as
the single most important player in the game.
We are going down a very slippery slope right now. Every day
that passes, more people are being destroyed. Out of one
side of its mouth, the government is telling the
corporations that there is a safety net, that, ultimately,
the full faith and credit of the United State will bail them
out.
That is YOUR full faith and YOUR credit, because the debts
of these big outfits are being stuffed right into your
pocket. And if you can't pay--well, you know what will
happen to you.
We need a new conservatism, a new Republican party and a
re-establishment of the American dream, as centered on this
country and the individuals who live in it, that is devoted
to their freedom, their prosperity, and their future, not to
the endless expansion of vast global enterprises that are
protected not only with our taxes, but even with the lives
of our sons and daughters in uniform.